Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chambers v. Maroney.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chambers v. Maroney Anchor | green | “there is little to choose in terms of practical consequences between an immediate search without a warrant and the car's immobilization until a warrant is obtained.” | 11 |
| 2 | Cardwell v. Lewis | green | “one has a lesser expectation of privacy in a motor vehicle because its function is transportation and it seldom serves as one's residence or as the repository of personal effects.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.