Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones Anchor | green | “to rehabilitate the indian's economic life and to give him a chance to develop the initiative destroyed by a century of oppression and paternalism.” | 12 |
| 2 | Adam v. Stonebridge Life Insurance | green | “to survive summary judgment, a plaintiff must substantiate his allegations with enough probative evidence to support a finding in his favor.” | 5 |
| 3 | Morgan v. Goldman | green | “a presumption of honesty and integrity in those serving as adjudicators.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.