Topic: more of one factor excuses less of the other. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #20489

5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Deu Thapa v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Deu Thapa v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States Anchor
ca2 · 2006
green “more of one factor excuses less of the other.” 7
2 ACC Bondholder Group v. Adelphia Communications Corp. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)
nysd · 2007
green “must be 'neither remote nor speculative, but actual and imminent.” 4
3 George E. Apostol v. Mark Gallion, John Auriemma v. Fred Rice, and City of Chicago
ca7 · 1989
green “it follows that a proper forsyth appeal divests the district court of jurisdiction (that is, authority) to require the appealing defendants to appear for trial.” 3
4 In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation
nysd · 2007
green “delay would be unconscionable, given the intense public interest in reaching an expeditious resolution to this litigation.” 3
5 In re 473 West End Realty Corp.
nysb · 2014
green “a stay pending appeal would injure the interests of sound case management in the bankruptcy process, and as a consequence, would also injure the public interest.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check