Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kellar v. Summit Seating Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kellar v. Summit Seating Inc. Anchor | green | “the de minimis doctrine allows employers to disregard otherwise compensable work when only a few seconds or minutes of work beyond the scheduled working hours are in dispute.” | 7 |
| 2 | Urnikis-Negro v. American Family Property Services | green | “the overtime provision of the imwl is parallel to that of the flsa, and illinois courts apply the same principles ... to the state provision.” | 4 |
| 3 | Ralph Condo v. Sysco Corporation | green | “the overtime provision of the imwl is parallel to that of the flsa, and illinois courts apply the same principles ... to the state provision.” | 3 |
| 4 | Haynes v. Tru-Green Corp. | green | “in light of their substantial similarities, provisions of the flsa and interpretations of that legislation can be considered in applying the imwl.” | 3 |
| 5 | Kerbes v. Raceway Associates, LLC | green | “in light of their substantial similarities, provisions of the flsa and interpretations of that legislation can be considered in applying the imwl.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.