Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Karl Kallmann, D/B/A Love's Barbeque Restaurant, No. 62, and Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, And.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karl Kallmann, D/B/A Love's Barbeque Restaurant, No. 62, and Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, And Anchor | green | “no obligation to accept his predecessor's labor agreement.” | 4 |
| 2 | Karl Kallmann, D/B/A Love's Barbeque Restaurant, No. 62, and Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, And | green | “the facts demonstrate that the successor would not have agreed to union demands to pay the higher rate,” | 4 |
| 3 | Karl Kallmann, D/B/A Love's Barbeque Restaurant, No. 62, and Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, And | green | “to the extent that a back pay order requires payment at the higher rate for the entire period of ownership, it acts as a penalty.” | 4 |
| 4 | New Breed Leasing Corporation, and v. National Labor Relations Board, And | green | “should be resolved against the employer who discriminates,” | 4 |
| 5 | New Breed Leasing Corporation, and v. National Labor Relations Board, And | green | “the board's grant of back pay based on the predecessor union's pay scale restores as nearly as possible the employment situation that would have occurred absent” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.