Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Air California v. United States Department Of Transportation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Air California v. United States Department Of Transportation Anchor | green | “neither a definitive statement of the agency's position nor a document with the status of law.” | 5 |
| 2 | Air California v. United States Department Of Transportation | green | “impose an obligation, deny a right, or fix some legal relationship.” | 5 |
| 3 | Air California v. United States Department Of Transportation | green | “warrant the faa's pursuance of contractual, injunctive, and civil penalty remedies.” | 5 |
| 4 | San Diego Air Sports Center, Inc., a California Corporation v. Federal Aviation Administration | green | “it would be futile for air one to attempt to persuade the faa to change the position it clearly sets forth” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.