Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richard Haithcock v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard Haithcock v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General Anchor | green | “where there is an ongoing, continuous series of discriminatory acts, they may be challenged in their entirety as long as one of those discriminatory acts falls within the limitations period.” | 7 |
| 2 | Alexander v. Local 496 | green | “a plaintiff is entitled to have a court consider all relevant actions allegedly taken pursuant to the employer's discriminatory policy or practice, including those that would otherwise be time barred.” | 5 |
| 3 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Penton Industrial Publishing Company, Inc. | green | “that some form of intentional discrimination against the class of which plaintiff was a member was the company's 'standing operating procedure.” | 4 |
| 4 | Richard Haithcock v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General | green | “there is an ongoing, continuous series of discriminatory acts, they may be challenged in their entirety as long as one of those discriminatory acts falls within the limitations period.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.