Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni Nourse.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni Nourse Anchor | green | “bad faith or conduct tantamount to bad faith.” | 7 |
| 2 | Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of California | green | “parties must understand that they will pay a price for failure to comply strictly with scheduling and other orders, and that failure to do so may properly support severe sanctions and exclusions of evidence.” | 7 |
| 3 | David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni Nourse | green | “three primary sources of authority enable courts to sanction parties or their lawyers for improper conduct: (1) federal rule of civil procedure 11, which applies to signed writings filed with the court, (2) 28 u.s.c. 1927 , which is aimed at penalizing conduct that unreasonably…” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.