Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Joseph Malcomb v. Craig McKean.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joseph Malcomb v. Craig McKean Anchor | green | “the plaintiff suffered deprivation of liberty consistent with the concept of seizure as a consequence of a legal proceeding.” | 5 |
| 2 | Rosembert v. Borough of East Lansdowne | green | “a plaintiff must establish (1) the existence of a conspiracy involving state action; and (2) a deprivation of civil rights in furtherance of the conspiracy by a party to the conspiracy.” | 5 |
| 3 | Gale v. Storti | green | “a plaintiff must allege that there was an agreement or meeting of the minds to violate his constitutional rights.” | 4 |
| 4 | Rosembert v. Borough of East Lansdowne | green | “(1) the existence of a conspiracy involving state action; and (2) a deprivation of civil rights in furtherance of the conspiracy by a party to the conspiracy.” | 3 |
| 5 | Moore v. Giorla | green | “claims brought under 1983 are subject to the state statutes of limitations governing personal injury actions.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.