Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 140 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sussman v. United States Marshals Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sussman v. United States Marshals Service Anchor | green | “agencies are entitled to a presumption that they complied with the obligation to disclose reasonably segregable material,” | 47 |
| 2 | Valfells v. Central Intelligence Agency | green | “a detailed justification and not just conclusory statements to demonstrate that all reasonably segregable information has been released.” | 35 |
| 3 | Wilderness Society v. United States Department of the Interior | green | “it has long been the rule in this circuit that non-exempt portions of a document must be disclosed unless they are inextricably intertwined with exempt portions.” | 21 |
| 4 | Hodge v. Federal Bureau of Investigation | green | “entitled to a presumption that it complied with the obligation to disclose reasonably segregable material,” | 16 |
| 5 | Roth Ex Rel. Bower v. United States Department of Justice | green | “even if the agency establishes an exemption, it must nonetheless disclose all reasonably segregable, nonexempt portions of the requested record(s).” | 13 |
| 6 | Wilderness Society v. United States Department of the Interior | green | “non-exempt portions of a document must be disclosed unless they are inextricably intertwined with exempt portions.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.