Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Ortiz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Ortiz Anchor | green | “one aggravating factor is sufficient to support the imposition of an upper term.” | 7 |
| 2 | People v. Kelley | green | “the court is presumed to have considered all relevant factors unless the record affirmatively shows the contrary.” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Peterson | green | “we cannot substitute our judgment for that of the trial court on issues of credibility.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Smith | green | “because adequate reasons for imposing full consecutive sentences on counts v and vi existed in abundance, the error in failing to state those reasons does not require a remand for resentencing” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Shazier | green | “i.e., patiently cultivating and manipulating her to achieve his purposes.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.