Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from William J. Plott v. State of Florida.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William J. Plott v. State of Florida Anchor | green | “a claim of error under apprendi and blakely is subject to a harmless error analysis.” | 8 |
| 2 | Theophile v. State | green | “to raise the issue timely, and thus preserve the point for appellate review, the defendant needed to request a jury trial on sentencing, or object to the trial judge sitting as the trier of fact, prior to the sentencing hearing.” | 4 |
| 3 | Luton v. State | green | “to raise the issue timely, and thus preserve the point for appellate review, the defendant needed to request a jury trial on sentencing, or object to the trial judge sitting as the trier of fact, prior to the sentencing hearing.” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Johnson | green | “the new constitutional rule announced in blakely does not apply retroactively to sentences or resentences that were final when it issued” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.