Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 140 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Stevens.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Stevens Anchor | green | “because of the difficulty in proving an actor's intent, only minimal circumstantial evidence is necessary to show that a defendant had the requisite intent.” | 23 |
| 2 | People v. Stevens | green | “(1) an attempt or threat with force or violence to do corporal harm to another (an assault), and (2) an intent to do great bodily harm less than murder.” | 21 |
| 3 | People v. Parcha | green | “(1) an attempt or threat with force or violence to do corporal harm to another (an assault), and (2) an intent to do great bodily harm less than murder.” | 19 |
| 4 | People v. Stevens | green | “this court will not interfere with the trier of fact's determinations regarding the weight of the evidence or the credibility of witnesses.” | 19 |
| 5 | People v. Brown | green | “(1) an attempt or threat with force or violence to do corporal harm to another (an assault), and (2) an intent to do great bodily harm less than murder.” | 15 |
| 6 | People v. Brown | green | “an intent to do serious injury of an aggravated nature.” | 15 |
| 7 | People v. Mitchell | neutral | “an intent to do serious injury of an aggravated nature.” | 7 |
| 8 | People v. Hampton | green | “a rational trier of fact could have found that the essential elements of the crime were proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 5 |
| 9 | People v. Grissom | green | “use care, diligence, and vigilance in securing and presenting evidence.” | 4 |
| 10 | People v. Parcha | green | “assault with intent to commit great bodily harm less than murder requires proof of (1) an attempt or threat with force or violence to do corporal harm to another (an assault), and (2) an intent to do great bodily harm less than murder.” | 4 |
| 11 | People v. Brown | green | “this court has defined the intent to do great bodily harm as an intent to do serious injury of an aggravated nature.” | 4 |
| 12 | People v. Cowell | green | “blandest of all possible terms.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.