Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Morris v. City of Chillicothe.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morris v. City of Chillicothe Anchor | green | “in considering a motion for summary judgment, the court does not weigh the evidence, make credibility determinations, or attempt to discern the truth of any factual issue.” | 8 |
| 2 | Morris v. City of Chillicothe | green | “does not weigh the evidence, make credibility determinations, or attempt to discern the truth of any factual issue.” | 3 |
| 3 | Gerry Hodge v. Walgreen Co. | green | “affirmative evidence, specific facts, showing that there is a genuine dispute” | 3 |
| 4 | Gerry Hodge v. Walgreen Co. | green | “fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case.” | 3 |
| 5 | Gerry Hodge v. Walgreen Co. | green | “movant has the burden of showing that there is no genuine issue of fact, . . . the plaintiff is not thereby relieved of his own burden of producing in turn evidence that would support a jury verdict.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.