Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Blank v. Kirwan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blank v. Kirwan Anchor | green | “in reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint against a general demurrer, we are guided by long-settled rules. 'we treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. we also consider matters which may…” | 16 |
| 2 | Moore v. Regents of University of California | green | “even as to matters not expressly ruled upon by the trial court.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.