Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ira A. Watson Department Store v. Hamilton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ira A. Watson Department Store v. Hamilton Anchor | green | “a worker's testimony is competent evidence of his physical condition and of his ability to perform various activities both before and after being injured.” | 9 |
| 2 | Ford Motor Co. v. Forman | green | “the type of work that the employee performed at the time of injury” | 4 |
| 3 | Ford Motor Co. v. Forman | green | “when used in the context of an award that is based upon an objectively determined functional impairment, 'the type of work that the employee performed at the time of injury' was most likely intended by the legislature to refer to the actual jobs that the individual performed.” | 4 |
| 4 | Ford Motor Co. v. Forman | green | “the actual jobs that the individual performed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.