Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano Anchor | green | “the doctrine of the law of the case requires that questions of law actually decided on appeal must govern the case in the same court and the trial court, through all subsequent stages of the proceedings.” | 16 |
| 2 | Bill Stroop Roofing, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County | green | “a county's refusal to obey a direct legislative mandate” | 2 |
| 3 | Bill Stroop Roofing, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County | green | “a county's refusal to obey a direct legislative mandate.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.