Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Doe No. 2 v. Kolko.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doe No. 2 v. Kolko Anchor | green | “the public generally has a strong interest in protecting the identities of sexual assault victims so that other victims will not be deterred from reporting such crimes.” | 7 |
| 2 | Roe v. Bernabei & Wachtel Pllc | green | “sexual harassment is not typically considered a matter so highly personal as to warrant proceeding by pseudonym.” | 4 |
| 3 | N.W. v. District of Columbia | green | “courts generally find a risk of retaliatory harm in cases where the moving party provides evidence that psychological damage or violent threats are anticipated if a party's identity is disclosed.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.