Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from New Jersey Highway Authority v. Renner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Jersey Highway Authority v. Renner Anchor | green | “justice is the polestar and our procedures must ever be moulded and applied with that in mind.” | 11 |
| 2 | Jansson v. Fairleigh Dickinson University | green | “the strong interests in the finality of litigation and judicial economy with the equitable notion that justice should be done in every case.” | 5 |
| 3 | New Jersey Highway Authority v. Renner | green | “after all, justice is the polestar and our procedures must ever be moulded and applied with that in mind.” | 2 |
| 4 | New Jersey Highway Authority v. Renner | green | “our procedures must ever be moulded and applied with that in mind.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.