Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 138 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph Anchor | green | “the party resisting arbitration bears the burden of proving that the claims at issue are unsuitable for arbitration.” | 65 |
| 2 | Century Indemnity Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London | green | “before compelling a party to arbitrate pursuant to the faa, a court must determine that (1) there is an agreement to arbitrate and (2) the dispute at issue falls within the scope of that agreement.” | 36 |
| 3 | Kirleis v. Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C. | green | “reflects a 'strong federal policy in favor of the resolution of disputes through arbitration.” | 20 |
| 4 | Bel-Ray Company, Inc. v. Chemrite (Pty) Ltd. | green | “upon being satisfied that the making of the agreement for arbitration or the failure to comply therewith is not in issue.” | 14 |
| 5 | Abdul Jaludi v. Citigroup | green | “the presumption of arbitrability enters at the second step-it applies to disputes about the scope of an existing arbitration clause.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.