Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Ultimate One Distributing Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Ultimate One Distributing Corp. Anchor | green | “use of a counterfeit mark creates a presumption of bad faith,” | 5 |
| 2 | Spin Master Ltd. v. Alan Yuan's Store | green | “courts have supported an inference of a broad scope of operations in cases dealing specifically with websites that ship and sell to a wide geographic range.” | 5 |
| 3 | Spin Master Ltd. v. Alan Yuan's Store | green | “have imported from copyright law a multifactor test” | 5 |
| 4 | Coach, Inc. v. Horizon Trading USA Inc. | green | “because counterfeits, by their very nature, cause confusion.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.