Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Miller.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Miller Anchor | green | “empirically based or not, the guidelines remain the guidelines.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Rodriguez | green | “date or befriend anyone who has children under the age of 18, without prior permission of the probation officer.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Duarte | green | “empirically based or not, the guidelines remain the guidelines.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Miller | green | “a condition limiting the use of a computer or an interactive computer service is recommended in cases in which the defendant used such items.” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Michael Shane Phipps and Dean Rayburn Gilley | green | “sexually oriented or sexually stimulating materials” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Boston | green | “given boston's history of sexual offenses and the desire to deter him from this conduct in the future, the condition in prohibiting his access to sexually explicit material involving adults is not overly broad.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.