Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Naylor v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Naylor v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “even if the facts are undisputed, the moving party has the burden of proving that its right to relief is so clear as a matter of law that summary relief is warranted.” | 8 |
| 2 | Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. Tom Wolf, Governor of the Comwlth of PA | green | “may grant summary relief where the dispute is legal rather than factual,” | 6 |
| 3 | Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. Tom Wolf, Governor of the Comwlth of PA | green | “in the light most favorable to the opposing party.” | 3 |
| 4 | Naylor v. Commonwealth | green | “the moving party has the burden of proving that its right to relief is so clear as a matter of law that summary relief is warranted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.