Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 137 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Haguer v. Committee for Industrial Organization.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haguer v. Committee for Industrial Organization Anchor | green | “have immemorially been held in trust for the use of the public and, time out of mind, have been used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions.” | 48 |
| 2 | Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc. | green | “whether the challenged provisions of the injunction burden no more speech than necessary to serve a significant government interest.” | 27 |
| 3 | United States v. Albertini | green | “simply because there is some imaginable alternative that might be less burdensome on speech.” | 16 |
| 4 | United States v. Kokinda | green | “the mere physical characteristics of the property cannot dictate forum analysis.” | 15 |
| 5 | Haguer v. Committee for Industrial Organization | green | “wherever the title of streets and parks may rest, they have immemorially been held in trust for the use of the public and, time out of mind, have been used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions.” | 14 |
| 6 | Frisby v. Schultz | green | “all public streets are held in the public trust and are properly considered traditional public fora.” | 14 |
| 7 | United States v. Scott | green | “a bullet could come your way today.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.