Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Baczkowski v. D.A. Collins Construction Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baczkowski v. D.A. Collins Construction Co. Anchor | green | “never requires, but merely authorizes, the supreme court to dismiss a plaintiffs action based on the plaintiffs unreasonable neglect to proceed” | 13 |
| 2 | Davis v. Goodsell | green | “such a dual showing is not strictly necessary in order for the plaintiff to escape such a dismissal” | 4 |
| 3 | Kadyimov v. Mackinnon | green | “the statute prohibits the supreme court from dismissing a complaint based on failure to prosecute whenever the plaintiff has shown a justifiable excuse for the delay and the existence of a potentially meritorious cause of action” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.