Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 137 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. Anchor | green | “by agreeing to arbitrate a statutory claim, a party does not forgo the substantive rights afforded by the statute; it only submits to their resolution in an arbitral, rather than a judicial, forum.” | 86 |
| 2 | Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. | green | “to make arbitration agreements as enforceable as other contracts, but not more so.” | 22 |
| 3 | Morgan v. Sundance, Inc. | green | “a court must hold a party to its arbitration contract just as the court would to any other kind.” | 18 |
| 4 | Compucredit Corp. v. Greenwood | green | “contrary congressional command” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.