Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Lawless.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Lawless Anchor | green | “elements of a crime, including those that establish its grade, may not be used as aggravating factors for sentencing of that particular crime.” | 13 |
| 2 | State v. A.T.C. | green | “a court, however, does not engage in double-counting when it considers facts showing defendant did more than the minimum the state is required to prove to establish the elements of an offense.” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. A.T.C. | green | “elements of a crime, including those that establish its grade, may not be used as aggravating factors for sentencing of that particular crime.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.