Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Arbour.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Arbour Anchor | green | “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Gonzalez-Melendez | green | “a district court's failure to attempt to inform defense counsel about the existence of a jury note, and further failure to solicit defense council's input regarding any response to such a note, violates rule 43 of the federal rules of criminal procedure.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Gonzalez-Melendez | green | “substantially verbatim recital of an oral statement made by a witness,” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Antonio Gaudino Vargas | green | “the denial or impairment of the right to exercise peremptory challenges is reversible error without a showing or prejudice.” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Larry Wayne Carper, Jr. | green | “already as short as it could possibly be under the sentencing guidelines,” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Pakala | green | “it is highly probable that the error did not influence the verdict.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.