Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Zenon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Zenon Anchor | green | “had concerns about the stability and reliability of the current letter of undertaking proffered by ocean marine mutual protection indemnity association, ltd.” | 7 |
| 2 | Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. | green | “a substitute for the vessel itself.” | 4 |
| 3 | Gorman v. Cerasia | green | “directing all potential claimants to file their claims against the shipowner in the district court within a specified period of time.” | 4 |
| 4 | Ontario Car Ferry Co. v. Rice | green | “obtain ex parte the issuance of a monition and injunction if he posts an ad interim stipulation in an amount approved by the court after examining affidavits presented by the shipowner” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.