Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Saizan v. Delta Concrete Products Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saizan v. Delta Concrete Products Co. Anchor | green | “there exists a strong presumption of the reasonableness of the lodestar amount.” | 10 |
| 2 | Tupelo Redevelopment Agency v. Gray Corp. | green | “the number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation, multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate.” | 6 |
| 3 | Dynasteel Corp. v. Aztec Industries, Inc. | green | “traditionally approved as reasonable awards of attorneys' fees in collection matters in the amount of one-third of the indebtedness.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.