Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Adeleke v. Fleckenstein.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adeleke v. Fleckenstein Anchor | green | “prisoners' claims of retaliation are regarded with skepticism and are carefully scrutinized by the courts.” | 10 |
| 2 | Bibbs v. Early | green | “is capable of deterring a person of ordinary firmness from further exercising his constitutional rights.” | 5 |
| 3 | Reese v. Skinner | green | “filing grievances and otherwise complaining about the conduct of correctional officers through proper channels are constitutionally protected activities, and prison officials may not retaliate against inmates for engaging in such protected inmates.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.