Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Wilk.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Wilk Anchor | green | “an abuse of discretion occurs if the district court applies an incorrect legal standard or makes findings of fact that are clearly erroneous.” | 9 |
| 2 | United States v. Felts | green | “left with a substantial and ineradicable doubt as to whether the jury was properly guided in its deliberations.” | 7 |
| 3 | United States v. Ladson | green | “the trial as a whole to determine whether the appellant was afforded a fundamentally fair trial.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.