Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau Anchor | green | “section 4 of the 1882 and 1887 acts apparently sought to limit, with exceptions, the access of national banks to, and their suability in, the federal courts to the same extent to which non-national banks are so limited.” | 4 |
| 2 | Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Cooper | green | “on the same footing as the banks of the state where they were located for all the purposes of the jurisdiction of the courts of the united states.” | 3 |
| 3 | Petri v. Commercial Nat. Bank of Chicago | green | “section 4 of the 1882 and 1887 acts apparently sought to limit, with exceptions, the access of national banks to, and their suability in, the federal courts to the same extent to which non-national banks are so limited.” | 3 |
| 4 | Firstar Bank, N.A., a National Banking Association v. Lawrence J. Faul and Faul Chevrolet, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation | green | “congress passed 28 u.s.c. 1348 against an interpretive background which assumed that national banks were to have the same access to the federal courts as state banks and corporations.” | 3 |
| 5 | Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Cooper | green | “national banks on the same footing as the banks of the state where they were located for all the purposes of the jurisdiction of the courts of the united states.” | 2 |
| 6 | Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Cooper | green | “was evidently intended to put national banks on the same footing as the banks of the state where they were located for all the purposes of the jurisdiction of the courts of the united states.” | 2 |
| 7 | Petri v. Commercial Nat. Bank of Chicago | green | “no reason is perceived why it should be held that congress intended that national banks should not resort to federal tribunals as other corporations and individual citizens might.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.