Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from County of Imperial v. Munoz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | County of Imperial v. Munoz Anchor | green | “strangers to the state court proceedings” | 4 |
| 2 | Henry Malachowski and Julia Malachowski v. City of Keene | green | “bad faith prosecution, harassment or any other unusual circumstances that would call for equitable relief.” | 3 |
| 3 | Wilder v. Thomas | green | “do not vary according to individual plaintiffs” | 3 |
| 4 | Raymond P. Zajac and Helen Ann Zajac v. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul | green | “past abuses of state court foreclosure proceedings.” | 3 |
| 5 | Duncan v. TOWN OF BLACKSBURG, VIRGINIA | green | “the bare fact that one plaintiff is joined with others who were parties and who can properly be bound by a prior proceeding does not justify preclusion of the nonparty plaintiff as well.” | 3 |
| 6 | Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Nesglo, Inc. | green | “when the applicant claims a right or interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action which may as a practical matter be impaired by the final disposition of the action” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.