Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from New York v. Ferber.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New York v. Ferber Anchor | green | “it is evident beyond the need for elaboration that a state's interest in 'safeguarding the physical and psychological well-being of a minor' is 'compelling.” | 15 |
| 2 | Outmezguine v. State | green | “the state unquestionably has a significant interest in protecting children, and in prohibiting the use of children as subjects in pornographic material.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.