Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust Anchor | green | “statistical disparities must be sufficiently substantial that they raise such an inference of causation.” | 8 |
| 2 | Elgaghil v. Tarrant County Junior College | green | “may raise only the specific issues made in the employee's administrative complaint and 'any kind of discrimination like or related to the charge's allegations.” | 5 |
| 3 | 58 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1655, 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,544 | green | “most naturally support a claim of intentional discrimination,” | 3 |
| 4 | Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. Dearing | green | “(1) isolate and identify the specific employment practice challenged; (2) demonstrate any observed statistical disparity that the practice has on the protected class; and (3) demonstrate a causal link between the identified practice and the demonstrated disparity.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.