Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Anchor | green | “any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity.” | 8 |
| 2 | Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc. | green | “(1) formation of a scheme or artifice to defraud; (2) use of the united states mails or wires, or causing such a use, in furtherance of the scheme; and (3) specific intent to deceive or defraud.” | 6 |
| 3 | Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc. | green | “wire or mail fraud consists of the following elements: (1) formation of a scheme or artifice to defraud; (2) use of the united states mails or wires, or causing such a use, in furtherance of the scheme; and (3) specific intent to deceive or defraud.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.