Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Steese v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Steese v. State Anchor | green | “substantial evidence is that which a reasonable mind might consider adequate to support a conclusion.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Simpson | green | “it is not our task, as an appellate court, to relitigate the battle of the experts.” | 4 |
| 3 | Jones v. State | green | “the defendant has sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding, and whether he has a rational and factual understanding of the proceedings against him.” | 3 |
| 4 | Calvin v. State | green | “as consistent with the dusky standard.” | 3 |
| 5 | Calvin v. State | green | “will not be overturned if it is supported by substantial evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.