Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp. Anchor | green | “time, place, and contents of the false representations.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States Ex Rel. Siewick v. Jamieson Science & Engineering, Inc. | green | “courts have been ready to infer certification from silence, but only where certification was a prerequisite to the government action sought.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States Ex Rel. Siewick v. Jamieson Science & Engineering, Inc. | green | “certification was a prerequisite to the government action sought.” | 5 |
| 4 | United States Ex Rel. Hockett v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. | green | “(1) defendant submitted a claim to the government; (2) which was false; and (3) which the defendant knew was false.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.