Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Wilfred American Educational Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Wilfred American Educational Corporation Anchor | green | “we will not presume that the district court declined to consider the relevant section 3622(a) evidence contained in the record” | 4 |
| 2 | Ouber v. Guarino | green | “basic, primary, or historical fact,” | 3 |
| 3 | Espinal v. Bennett | green | “state court unreasonably assessed the facts of this case by concluding that the redacted report did not support the petitioner's alibi claims” | 3 |
| 4 | Pueblo v. Marcano Parrilla | green | “could have created a reasonable doubt in the mind of the trier of facts.” | 3 |
| 5 | Quintanilla v. Marchilli | green | “question that remains open in this circuit.” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Jonathan Sutton | green | “we will not presume that the district court declined to consider the relevant section 3622(a) evidence contained in the record” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.