Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lyerla v. AMCO Insurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lyerla v. AMCO Insurance Anchor | green | “an insurer is obligated to defend its insured if the underlying complaint contains allegations that potentially fall within the scope of coverage.” | 6 |
| 2 | Health Care Industry Liability Insurance Program v. Momence Meadows Nursing Center, Inc. | green | “an insurer is obligated to defend its insured if the underlying complaint contains allegations that potentially fall within the scope of coverage.” | 5 |
| 3 | Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Employers Insurance Company Of Wausau | green | “actually falls within the scope of coverage.” | 4 |
| 4 | American Bankers Insurance Co v. Robert Shockley, Jr. | green | “decide issues of ultimate fact that could bind the parties to the underlying litigation.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.