Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bird v. Shearson Lehman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bird v. Shearson Lehman Anchor | green | “embodies the national policy favoring arbitration and places arbitration agreements on equal footing with all other contracts,” | 5 |
| 2 | Laif Sprl v. Axtel | green | “whether one party to the agreement has failed, neglected or refused to arbitrate.” | 5 |
| 3 | Begonja v. Vornado Realty Trust | green | “the party moving to compel arbitration 'must make a prima facie initial showing that an agreement to arbitrate existed before the burden shifts to the party opposing arbitration to put the making of that agreement in issue.” | 5 |
| 4 | Laif Sprl v. Axtel | green | “under the faa, the role of courts is limited to determining two issues: i) whether a valid agreement or obligation to arbitrate exists, and ii) whether one party to the agreement has failed, neglected or refused to arbitrate.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.