Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,418 United States of America v. Micheal L. Gruenberg, United States of America v. Eugene I. Gruenberg.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,418 United States of America v. Micheal L. Gruenberg, United States of America v. Eugene I. Gruenberg Anchor | green | “a willful blindness instruction is appropriate when the defendant asserts a lack of guilty knowledge, but the evidence supports an inference of deliberate ignorance.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States of America v. Thomas P. Lalley | green | “if the instructions, taken as a whole, fairly and adequately submitted the issues to the jury.” | 5 |
| 3 | Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,418 United States of America v. Micheal L. Gruenberg, United States of America v. Eugene I. Gruenberg | green | “burying one's head in the sand,” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. James L. Parker | green | “either actual knowledge or no knowledge of the facts in question.” | 3 |
| 5 | United States of America v. Thomas P. Lalley | green | “fairly and adequately submitted the issues to the jury.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.