Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Chateaugay Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Chateaugay Corporation Anchor | green | “the party who appeals without seeking to avail himself of that protection does so at his own risk.” | 8 |
| 2 | In Re Chateaugay Corporation | green | “knock the props out from under the authorization for every transaction that has taken place and create an unmanageable, uncontrollable situation for the bankruptcy court.” | 6 |
| 3 | In Re Chateaugay Corporation | green | “reviewing courts presume that it will be inequitable or impractical to grant relief after substantial consummation of a plan of reorganization.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.