Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. James Clinton Adrian, United States of America v. James Clinton Adrian.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. James Clinton Adrian, United States of America v. James Clinton Adrian Anchor | green | “assuming that the evidence would be admissible, a reasonable trier of fact could find the evidence persuasive in establishing the proposition for which the government seeks to admit it.” | 4 |
| 2 | The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Hercules Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Hercules Powder Company | green | “district courts have inherent power to control their dockets” | 4 |
| 3 | The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Hercules Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Hercules Powder Company | green | “district courts have inherent power to control their dockets.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. James Clinton Adrian, United States of America v. James Clinton Adrian | green | “a reasonable trier of fact could find the evidence persuasive in establishing the proposition for which the government seeks to admit it.” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Benjamin Lloyd Hicks | green | “district court that orders the government and the defendant to exchange witness lists and summaries of anticipated witness testimony in advance of trial has exceeded its authority under rule 16 of the federal rules of criminal procedure and has committed error.” | 2 |
| 6 | The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Hercules Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Hercules Powder Company | green | “district courts have inherent power to control their dockets, but not when its exercise would nullify the procedural choices reserved to parties under the federal rules.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.