Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 135 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bowles, Price Administrator, v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bowles, Price Administrator, v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. Anchor | green | “plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” | 47 |
| 2 | Bowles, Price Administrator, v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. | green | “controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” | 38 |
| 3 | Bowles, Price Administrator, v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. | green | “the ultimate criterion is the administrative interpretation, which becomes of controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” | 22 |
| 4 | Gardebring v. Jenkins | green | “alternative reading is compelled by the regulation's plain language or by other indications of the secretary's intent at the time of the regulation's promulgation.” | 14 |
| 5 | Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc. | green | “criteria necessarily require significant expertise and entail the exercise of judgment grounded in policy concerns.” | 7 |
| 6 | Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. | green | “the ultimate criterion is the administrative interpretation, which becomes of controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” | 5 |
| 7 | Bray v. Dowling | green | “beaton did not recognize or discuss the distinction between a single caretaker who is obligated to expend afdc funds for the benefit of all the minor children in her household and a non-legally responsible individual who has no corresponding obligation.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.