2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Anchor | green | “he decision of whether to remand for further proceedings turns upon the likely utility of such proceedings.” | 9 |
| 2 | Lee R. MARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “because we remand for reconsideration of step three, we do not reach the other arguments raised.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.