Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 135 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Heckler v. Campbell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heckler v. Campbell Anchor | green | “any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment . . . which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve months.” | 88 |
| 2 | Joseph BURNS, Appellant v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | green | “we also have made clear that we are not permitted to weigh the evidence or substitute our own conclusions for that of the fact-finder.” | 35 |
| 3 | Monsour Medical Center v. Heckler | green | “so long as an agency's fact-finding is supported by substantial evidence, reviewing courts lack power to reverse . . . those findings.” | 6 |
| 4 | Cortes v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “the grounds upon which an administrative order must be judged are those upon which the record discloses that its action was based.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.