Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Adoption of Kenten H..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Adoption of Kenten H. Anchor | green | “prospectively from the date indian child status is established on the record” | 3 |
| 2 | State Ex Rel. Sdc | green | “did not challenge the trial court's finding or argue that the evidence supporting the conclusion was insufficient” | 3 |
| 3 | In the Interest of Cd | green | “crediting the state's icwa expert who was not versed on cherokee traditions and culture above the cherokee nation's icwa expert.” | 3 |
| 4 | In the Interest of Cd | green | “to children who have already suffered abuse or neglect,” | 3 |
| 5 | In the Interest of Cd | green | “we review the juvenile court's factual findings for clear error and its conclusions of law for correctness, affording the court some discretion in applying the law to the facts.” | 3 |
| 6 | In Re the Adoption of Sara J. | green | “was designed to provide state courts with flexibility in determining the disposition of a placement proceeding involving an indian child.” | 3 |
| 7 | In Re Adoption of Kenten H. | green | “the provisions of icwa . . . apply prospectively from the date indian child status is established on the record.” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.