Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from University of Texas Medical School at Houston v. Than.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Texas Medical School at Houston v. Than Anchor | green | “the remedy for a denial of due process is due process.” | 13 |
| 2 | In Re DW | green | “because an extension of the dismissal date is similar to a continuance and because section 263.401(b) does not indicate which appellate standard of review to apply, we apply the abuse of discretion standard.” | 3 |
| 3 | In Re EDL | green | “the right to compel the trial court by mandamus to conduct the adversary hearing promptly.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.