Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hiatt v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hiatt v. State Anchor | green | “child victims of sexual crimes are afforded great latitude when testifying and they are not expected to testify with the same clarity and ability as is expected of a mature and capable adult.” | 6 |
| 2 | Hiatt v. State | green | “not expected to testify with the same clarity and ability as is expected of a mature and capable adult.” | 5 |
| 3 | White v. State | green | “prevents corroboration, contradiction, and the influencing of witnesses.” | 4 |
| 4 | Russell v. State | green | “question in assessing the harm of allowing peavy to remain in the courtroom is whether she was influenced in her testimony by the testimony she heard.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.